Did Theresa May just commit the UK to
keeping a key Vote Leave promise? No, not the £350 million – we may be getting
back full control over our own laws, but not the laws of arithmetic. I mean this
one, signed
by three current members of the Cabinet, Boris Johnson, Priti Patel, and
Michael Gove:
There will be no change for EU citizens already lawfully resident in the UK. These EU citizens will automatically be granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK and will be treated no less favourably than they are at present
In fact, when the UK belatedly
produced its counterproposals
on the rights of UK citizens in the EU and EU citizens here, they were considerably
less generous than the offer made by the EU27, and in particular they explicitly
removed a number of important rights. Perhaps most obviously, the UK proposes that
EU citizens in the UK will no longer have the same rights to be joined by
family members, but instead will be subject to the considerably more
restrictive rules applied to UK nationals:
Future family members of those EU citizens who arrived before the specified date – for example a future spouse – who come to the UK after we leave the EU, will be subject to the same rules that apply to non-EU nationals joining British citizens
Now, some might argue that this is “fair”,
because it brings to an end a position where EU nationals in the UK (and indeed
UK nationals elsewhere in the EU) have, in some respects, more rights than
Britons here. On the other hand, EU nationals who moved here exercising their
free movement rights did so on the basis that they had these rights, which the UK
signed up to in various Directives.
Moreover – and this is my view – if anyone is
really worried about the “unfairness” to British citizens, then that unfairness
could be ended tomorrow by the UK government, which could simply give us the same
rights EU citizens have. The fact that most of those who make this argument are
unprepared to contemplate this solution carries more than a whiff of hypocrisy. Nor are these the only rights EU nationals
will lose, as Dr Mike Ward explains.
Some commentators – in particular,
Migration Watch and Daniel Hannan – continue to attempt to mislead
the public about this: for example, Daniel Hannan recently claimed
that “EU citizens will have all the same rights as now”, while Migration Watch argue
that when they said that “EU citizens will keep their existing rights” they
didn’t mean all their
existing rights. But no one senior in government
has made such an obviously false claim; indeed, David Davis explicitly
recognised that EU nationals would lose some of their current rights, saying “we
agonised” over the issue.
That is, until today, when in response
to a question from an Italian journalist, the Prime Minister did just that (video – at about 1.13):
Q. As you said, 600,000 Italians now live in the UK. You said that you want them to remain. What is going to change for them – I guess something is going to change?
A. (the Prime Minister). We set out that for those EU citizens currently living in the UK who have made the UK their home, including those 600, 000 Italians who are in the UK, we want them to be able to stay and to have the same rights as they have at the moment.
That is unequivocal. The same rights they have now. Now, of course, the Prime Minister’s statement
is technically untrue – the UK has set out no such thing.
But that’s not really the point,
because what matters is not what we’ve said so far, but what we do next – and in
particular, what David Davis and Ollie Robbins, our lead representatives, say
at the negotiations next week. Monsieur
Barnier has already signalled very
clearly in his response to the speech that he expects them to make good on the Prime
Minister’s promise.
So do they say that the Prime Minister
didn’t really mean it, or didn’t understand what she was saying, and that the
UK’s position remains unchanged – we have no intention of giving EU citizens “the
same rights as they have at the moment”?
In that case, why on earth should anyone in the rest of the EU27 take
anything she, or the UK government says, seriously? Such a course would be
deeply damaging to the Prime Minister’s credibility (especially in Italy, where
her comments have been widely, and accurately, reported). Or do they, belatedly, do the right thing,
and change the UK’s approach - a course
of action which would generate a huge amount of goodwill? Three million EU citizens here and a million
Britons elsewhere in the EU are waiting to hear.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.